Cart
Craig Hemke for Sprott Money sits down with Stephanie Pomboy of MacroMavens to break down Fed policy, rising inflation, bond market stress, and why hard assets remain critical in 2026.
Gold Spot Price And Federal Reserve Policy In 2026
Craig Hemke sat down with renowned macro analyst Stephanie Pomboy to discuss the rapidly evolving landscape surrounding the Federal Reserve, inflation, interest rates, and the long-term outlook for gold and silver investors. The conversation focused heavily on what a Kevin Warsh-led Federal Reserve might mean for monetary policy after the Jerome Powell era and why investors should continue paying close attention to hard assets like gold, silver, and energy commodities. Throughout the discussion, Pomboy emphasized that the global economy may be entering a fundamentally different era from the disinflationary environment investors enjoyed over the last four decades. She argued that the old system built on globalization and ever-lower interest rates is breaking apart, creating long-term bullish conditions for precious metals and commodities. Investors following the gold spot price and silver spot price trends are increasingly paying attention to these macroeconomic shifts as central banks worldwide struggle with rising debt burdens and weakening fiscal conditions.
Craig Hemke opened the discussion by asking what would differentiate a Warsh-led Federal Reserve from the Powell era. Pomboy responded that while Kevin Warsh brings “novel ideas” to monetary policy, there are major questions surrounding whether those ideas can actually work in practice. She explained that Warsh appears interested in cutting the Fed funds rate while simultaneously shrinking the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet, something she believes could prove extremely difficult. According to Pomboy, “the Fed funds lever is broken and the only mechanism that works anymore is the balance sheet.” She argued that inflation pressures remain much more persistent than many policymakers expect, especially after recent increases in oil prices and accelerating services inflation. Pomboy noted that even so-called “core” inflation metrics excluding food and energy were beginning to look problematic again, suggesting the Federal Reserve may not have the flexibility markets are hoping for. This directly impacts investors looking to buy gold or buy silver as protection against long-term currency debasement and inflationary monetary policy. Pomboy repeatedly stressed that global debt levels and interest costs are becoming unsustainable, making traditional monetary tightening increasingly dangerous for policymakers.
Buy Gold And Buy Silver During Global Debt Crisis
One of the most important themes discussed during the interview was the exploding cost of servicing government debt. Craig Hemke referenced U.S. interest expenses approaching $1.3 trillion annually and questioned how policymakers could realistically normalize interest rates when current Treasury yields are already far above the government’s average borrowing cost. Pomboy agreed, explaining that “the average interest rate that they're paying does not really exist in the market today.” She outlined what she believed was the original strategy behind Warsh’s proposed policy framework: cutting short-term rates to reduce government interest expense while hoping pro-growth policies would boost revenues and calm bond investors. In theory, this could gradually reduce long-term yields without direct quantitative easing. However, Pomboy expressed deep skepticism that such a strategy could succeed because the Federal Reserve remains the “marginal buyer” of Treasuries at a time when foreign creditors are steadily reducing their exposure to U.S. debt. She specifically pointed to countries like Turkey liquidating Treasury holdings and even selling gold reserves to fund rising energy costs after oil price spikes. Despite that temporary selling pressure, Pomboy argued this actually strengthens the long-term bullish case for precious metals because nations will eventually need to rebuild depleted gold reserves. Investors researching invest in silver for beginners or monitoring broader commodity cycles may find this trend particularly important as central banks continue diversifying away from fiat currencies and Treasury securities.
The conversation then shifted toward the broader global bond market crisis and the end of the multi-decade trend of falling interest rates. Pomboy argued that the world is now exiting the globalization era that began after Paul Volcker defeated inflation in the early 1980s. She explained that globalization created a powerful disinflationary force by allowing cheap goods and capital to move freely across borders, helping suppress both inflation and interest rates for decades. However, according to Pomboy, “the path for interest rates is higher, not lower” as deglobalization accelerates globally. She emphasized that investors today have largely never experienced a sustained environment of structurally rising rates and persistent inflation. Trade wars, supply chain nationalism, geopolitical tensions, and reserve currency diversification are all contributing to this transition. Pomboy argued that quantitative easing may ultimately become unavoidable because global governments can no longer finance massive deficits through traditional foreign demand for sovereign debt. She famously summarized the situation by saying “the real TINA is QE,” meaning there may ultimately be “no alternative” to renewed money printing. This outlook strongly supports long-term demand for hard assets, particularly among investors looking for protection against declining purchasing power and financial repression.
Silver Spot Price Outlook And Yield Curve Control
Craig Hemke later referenced comments from former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson warning that the Federal Reserve may eventually need a “break the glass” emergency plan if the Treasury market becomes unstable. Pomboy responded that such a plan would likely involve some form of yield curve control, where the Federal Reserve directly intervenes to cap long-term interest rates through balance sheet expansion. She also discussed the possibility of forcing pension funds or domestic institutions to hold greater amounts of Treasury debt or even making Treasury interest tax-free to artificially stimulate domestic demand. However, Pomboy made clear that these types of interventions only reinforce the bullish case for gold and silver because they represent additional forms of financial repression and currency debasement. As countries around the world increasingly intervene in debt markets to manage unsustainable deficits, many investors continue turning toward physical bullion and commodities as alternative stores of value. Those researching the gold spot price and broader precious metals markets are increasingly focused on these structural macroeconomic pressures rather than short-term fluctuations.
Toward the end of the interview, the discussion returned to inflation, oil prices, and the Federal Reserve’s next policy moves. Pomboy stated she finds it difficult to imagine Kevin Warsh aggressively hiking interest rates early in his tenure because any major tightening could destabilize financial markets and create severe economic consequences similar to the 1987 market crash under Alan Greenspan. Instead, she believes policymakers will likely hope current inflation pressures prove temporary while waiting for oil prices to decline. However, she warned that energy prices may continue trending higher over the long run due to growing AI infrastructure demand and broader structural energy shortages. Pomboy argued that lowering Fed funds rates mainly benefits the federal government rather than ordinary borrowers because consumers and businesses borrow at longer-term market rates that remain elevated. Throughout the conversation, she consistently emphasized that the Federal Reserve’s real priority has historically been protecting financial markets and maintaining systemic stability rather than aggressively fighting inflation.
Invest In Gold And Silver For Long-Term Wealth Protection
The interview concluded with Craig Hemke praising Stephanie Pomboy as one of the most respected independent macroeconomic voices in financial markets today. Pomboy encouraged viewers to visit MacroMavens.com for more analysis on debt markets, inflation, monetary policy, and systemic financial risks. The discussion ultimately reinforced the growing belief among many macro analysts that the global economy is entering a new era characterized by structurally higher inflation, increasing fiscal instability, geopolitical fragmentation, and more aggressive central bank intervention. In that type of environment, physical precious metals continue to play a critical role for investors seeking long-term wealth preservation outside the traditional financial system.
For investors concerned about inflation, rising debt, and ongoing monetary intervention, now may be an important time to evaluate opportunities to invest in physical precious metals. Whether monitoring the gold spot price, silver spot price, or broader commodity trends, many market participants continue to see gold and silver as essential hard assets during periods of financial uncertainty and currency debasement.
Craig (00:00)
Hello again from Sprott Money SprottMoney.com. It is the month of May, 2026, another busy volatile month. And it's time for your Ask the Expert segment. I'm your host, Craig Hemke. And joining me this month is my old friend, Steph Pomboy. Steph, a fantastic macro analyst and economist, who you can find her work at macromavens.com. And I urge you to check that out. And it's gonna be my pleasure to visit with her today and talk about.
Stephanie Pomboy (00:17)
You
Craig (00:28)
Fed monetary policy, what maybe everybody's getting wrong about where we go from here, at least what I think and see what Steph thinks. Anyway, Steph, thanks for taking some time.
Stephanie Pomboy (00:37)
My pleasure. And I can't imagine that I'm going to say anything that you haven't already thought of and digested and sliced and diced 10 times forward and backward already, but we'll try.
Craig (00:51)
We'll give it a run. We'll give it a run. ⁓
Well, anyway, thank you for joining us and everybody please thank Sprott Money for this content. Got a great deal going on right now at SprottMoney.com. If you buy in bulk of silver, and I'm just talking a couple of tubes, you save significant amount of dollars and ⁓ they're always having great deals at Sprott Money. So you should always check them out anytime you're in the market or just call them at 888-861-0775. ⁓
Steph, we are here middle of May. We are now six days on since the end of the Jerry Powell Fed. And we're now getting into the Kevin Warsh Fed. ⁓ Let's start there at a kind of 37,000 foot view. What do you think will be different in a Warsh-led Fed from a Powell-led Fed?
Stephanie Pomboy (01:30)
Ha ha.
Well, I think there's a lot that purports to be different, what ultimately proves to be different.
is a whole other question because I think obviously Kevin Warsh comes in with some novel ideas about how to reshape monetary policy and those ⁓ ideas primarily seem to do ⁓ the opposite of what I think they are able to do and that is namely to cut the Fed funds rate and simultaneously shrink the balance sheet. And ⁓ you know, I've been saying for some time, I feel like the Fed funds
lever is broken and the only mechanism that works anymore is the balance sheet. So this is all very interesting to me and I'll be quite fascinated to watch how this grand experiment works out. But of course, ⁓ we already have a flying the ointment ⁓ with the markets now going from shifting from expecting Fed rate cuts to Fed tightening because of the spike in oil prices and the attendant rise in the inflation measures, which actually, you know, it wasn't just confined to energy. The ex food and energy numbers looked out
and services inflation ⁓ was clearly accelerating as well. So it does beg the question of how much of a change Warsh is really going to be able to make in the sort of monetary status quo that we've been living in for the last ⁓ however long. So there's my analysis in a nutshell.
Craig (03:12)
I
think that's a great nutshell. Do you think he has room? I wrote a thing, I guess it was just this week, first brought money, you know, about the math, would seem to be the math in terms of, the last 12 months is something like $1.3 trillion in interest debt service. know, so we're, I got kind of back of the napkin math. It's about maybe an average interest rate of maybe 3%. I mean,
Stephanie Pomboy (03:22)
Mm-hmm. Yeah.
Craig (03:40)
We don't have anything close to 3 % in the treasury curve at this point. What can he do?
Stephanie Pomboy (03:45)
Absolutely. The average interest rate that they're paying does not really exist in the market today. So it's a problem. And I think the idea, and I would say it's very hopeful, is the original plan, as I understood it, was he was going to come in, he was going to cut the Fed funds rate, which given our massive reliance on T-bills to finance the deficits, would immediately shrink that.
interest expense portion of the deficit, which is basically the whole story right now. So if he could gradually bring down interest expense, the deficit itself would start to gradually shrink.
Craig (04:16)
Yeah.
Stephanie Pomboy (04:24)
that coupled with these pro-growth policies, which are accelerating revenues and slowing cyclical outlays, all would create this environment where maybe you would persuade the bond vigilantes that we actually had a chance of bringing our fiscal house, not in order, but let's say into some kind of modestly less awful situation. And that in turn would pull long rates downward so that they wouldn't have to do QE to pull long rates downward.
it would naturally come down as the front end of the curve lowered the interest expense. ⁓ And that would create this backdrop against which over time he'd actually be able to pair the balance sheet because it wouldn't be as important in supporting the long end of the treasury curve. But I thought where you were going with the math is the math about who's financing these deficits to begin with because right now,
⁓ our foreign creditors have long since left the building. And the one thing this Iran situation has done is to accelerate their exit, not necessarily by choice, but because for every dollar ⁓ increase in the price of oil, they've got to come up with an extra dollar to pay for that. And they're using their treasury slush funds, as it were, to fund those increased ⁓ energy purchases in the new countries like Turkey, which have now completely depleted.
their treasury hoard and are now turning to gold, which they had just recently added to their reserve position and raping and pillaging there, again, not by choice. ⁓ So I think that's the real conundrum for me, the math around how do you really shrink the Fed's balance sheet at a time when they are clearly the marginal buyer of treasuries outside of hedge funds doing basis trades, which isn't a reliable, sustainable source of support for our deficit financing.
and stablecoin issuance, is still in the hundreds of billions of dollars. And we're rolling $10 trillion of paper a year thanks to this reliance on T-bills.
Craig (06:32)
goes back to the Yellen days, doesn't it? Yeah. Well, and this is a global phenomenon, mean, the Japanese bond market is, I mean, for being Japan, over 3 % in their longer dated paper, the gilts in the UK are north of six. ⁓ What do you make of this being like a global problem for the global central banks, not just a US center?
Stephanie Pomboy (06:33)
Yes.
Yep. Yep.
Yeah, no, it absolutely is. And I guess, ⁓ you know, I've been thinking about this for a long time in a secular framework. And that's not very helpful for people who trying to trade the markets on a day to day basis or even over the next few months. But it's helpful to think about the long term backdrop, because we have all invested in an environment where interest rates have been slowly and steadily moving lower and lower since, you know, the Volcker
era in the early 1980s, rates have done nothing but move downward. And ⁓ that has created a tailwind for financial markets in general and has been hugely supportive of financial asset prices. ⁓ But what's interesting is that ⁓ we're now kind of at the end of that era, I would think, because
What allowed those rates to move so sharply downward after Volcker rung out the excesses of the inflation ⁓ back in the early 80s was the advent of globalization and the removal of trade barriers that allowed for cheap, the cheap flow of goods and capital around the world. And we've enjoyed that for four decades. mean, basically no one who's investing today has ever invested in a time when that wasn't the backdrop.
And I think it's really important to think about the shift away from globalization, which isn't, you know, it's accelerating now, but it's been underway basically since the global financial crisis. When we fired the starter pistol on the demise of, you know, the dollars reserve currency status and the rest of the world said, you're just going to print money. OK, we see where this is going and began to diversify out of the dollar. So we've been kind of gradually, very slowly and glacially.
Craig (08:32)
Thank
Stephanie Pomboy (08:49)
edging our way, this pendulum has been shifting away from globalization. And then, of course, Trump comes in and starts slapping on tariffs. And we have these kind of global tit for tat. But it's just a sort of cyclical accelerant in a secular trend that was already moving in that direction. ⁓ And the point I'm getting to is that we're talking about an environment over the long term sweep of things where just as globalization beget lower interest rates and lower inflation, so should
deglobalization beget the opposite. So we should expect to see, and I'm not saying we're going to get a 10 % bond yield this over the next year. I'm just saying in general, the path for interest rates is higher, not lower. And the same with inflation. And so I think to analyze what we're going through now within that secular framework is helpful. And it just, to me, underscores this idea that this notion that the Fed can shrink the balance sheet is just fanciful.
because it denies this reality that, you know, if we couldn't fund our deficits with the inflows, all the dollars that were being recycled over the trade transom, ⁓ you know, a few years ago, why are we going to be able to do it better now or next year, even less? ⁓ And basically, we're giving the rest of the world, we're telling them, we're going to do less trade with you. So we're handing them less money that needs to come back to our Treasury market. And if they're not going to
Craig (10:06)
Yeah.
Stephanie Pomboy (10:18)
You know, they're already trying to diversify the withering trade dollars are getting out of Treasury. So, you know, this is where I come up with that Tina. There is no alternative. You know, the real Tina isn't stocks. The real Tina is QE, in my view. But we'll find out.
Craig (10:35)
Yeah. What did
you make of, I guess it was last month now, it was back in April, when I hadn't seen Hank Paulson in a decade, I don't think. I mean, he was doing philanthropic stuff and teaches in classes, you know, like these guys do for people watching. Henry Paulson, you probably remember the name, was the secretary of treasury under the George W. Bush administration during the financial crisis. And I haven't seen him since 15, 16 years.
Stephanie Pomboy (10:47)
Yep.
Mm-hmm.
Craig (11:05)
suddenly appears on Bloomberg talking about, oh boy, the Fed better have a backup plan to break the glass if things really get a little wacky in the bond market. He wasn't really going come out and say what the break the glass plan would be. What do you make one of the timing of this? And two, what do think that plan would be?
Stephanie Pomboy (11:27)
Yeah, well, I mean, I can't imagine what the plan would be.
outside of some form of yield curve control via the balance sheet. ⁓ I mean, the alternative plan would be things that we've probably all thought about prior, which would be to mandate that all public pension funds hold X percent of their assets in safe treasury securities, ⁓ those kind of ⁓ regulatory ⁓ shenanigans that they could do to kind of force
more people into the Treasury market. I had, I don't know if you and I talked about it, but it was probably in 2024 when they, you know, the Trump campaign was getting going and Besant was out there talking, you know, where they were talking about no tax on tips and no tax on overtime. And I was saying we should have no tax on Treasuries. You know, they should make them tax free because then you would create a domestic source of demand.
Craig (12:22)
Yeah
Stephanie Pomboy (12:25)
for treasury debt. Here we are relying on the kindness of strangers and they don't want to us money anymore. Why not get American citizens a break for buying treasury paper? if you do the math on that, it costs you nothing because every percentage point decrease in treasury yield saves you what, $300 billion, I guess, on the interest expense.
And the amount of ⁓ interest income tax paid to the Treasury from ⁓ Treasury interest is microscopic. I I think it's under a hundred billion a year or something like that. mean, the numbers speak for themselves. It would seem to be a free thing to do, but they didn't bite on that. So I don't know what the break the glass policy plan is, ⁓ but I do think the timing's interesting and especially
with the 30-year auction that we saw recently in this backup in global bond yields that you talked about. mean, clearly, it's not just our problem. It's a global problem. And ⁓ I expect we'll probably see more of those pressures, especially if Warsh actually endeavors to shrink the balance sheet.
Craig (13:26)
Yeah.
And I guess that's what I'm thinking while you're talking. I guess that's kind of what I'm driving at in terms of how this impacts gold and silver and other real assets. And that if the US heads down a path of yield curve control, of funding its own deficit and keeping rates low because of the interest expense, everything else, everybody else has to do it too, don't they? Wouldn't the Bank of Japan have to go back to it? Wouldn't the Bank of England have to do it? Wouldn't the ECB?
Stephanie Pomboy (14:05)
Yep, absolutely. And it just makes having hard assets ⁓ instead of fiat currencies in your reserve base that much more important. that's why when I watch gold get tossed out, ⁓ you know, by countries like Turkey, et cetera, as they try to keep up with this rising price of oil, I don't even lose sleep about it because I know this is just setting a base from which it's going to have to move up that much higher. And I think
Craig (14:28)
Yeah.
Stephanie Pomboy (14:33)
⁓ This is also true of oil, that once this whole situation is wrapped up, ⁓ it will be like the post-COVID shifts that we saw around global supply chains, where it was a wake-up call and people said, we rely on China for all our PPE and all this, you know, and we might not have access to that in this situation, that maybe these countries will say, look, we need not only an oil reserve, but our oil reserve needs to be significant.
and our gold reserves that we were building that we had to deplete by choice, we need to really get aggressive in building that back and dedicating, rededicating ourselves to having this more hard asset bent. But of course, I've been swilling my own Kool-Aid for quite a while now, so of course I would say that.
Craig (15:24)
you
But that's why you do a great job. You are my favorite macro maven. That's exactly right. That's right. All right. So, I guess my last question, what do you expect? mean, we've, I mean, we started this year, you know, with this, like you said, this notion that, I mean, Trump was trying to fire Powell because he wasn't cutting rates fast enough. Right. So it was just expected that, I mean, it's not like they're going to put Warsh in to be a hawk. I mean,
Stephanie Pomboy (15:31)
⁓ I'm drunk on my own Kool-Aid and it is dee-licious.
Yep. Yep.
Craig (15:59)
He had to kind of be on the same team as Trump and Besant. So he had this notion we're going to get at least two rate cuts, if not more. Now it's 50-50, whether we'll just stay where we are with Fed funds or hike by December. What do you think is going to happen? do you think, I mean, they kind of throw a hike out there just to show that, we're serious about inflation and then cut, cut, cut, cut, cut. How do you think this plays out?
Stephanie Pomboy (16:12)
Yep. Yep.
gone. mean, if he hikes, I think it would be.
the repeat of Alan Greenspan in 86. You know, he takes the helm as the Fed chairman, he hikes rates, and then you have immediately, you know, the crash in 1987, and he is completely chastened by that experience and then forever becomes this uber-dub who always and everywhere overstays accommodation. So I would think that would be the parallel. I have a very hard time imagining that Warsh would raise rates as his first
⁓ course of action. ⁓ You know, I think that they believe that this oil price situation is going to be transitory, let's use the dread word, and that ⁓ once they wrap up this Iran thing, oil prices are going to come crashing downward. And I wholly agree with that, but I just think that that decline
Craig (17:11)
you
Stephanie Pomboy (17:21)
will be extremely short lived before we set back marching higher again. mean, people forget that oil was marching higher before we went into Iran and everyone's so excited about AI and the boom in CapEx, but they don't think about, well, that means you're going to have massive demands on energy. So it just continues to put upward pressure on that entire complex. So I think this idea that
you know, the inflation will go away and that if Kevin Warsh just sits aside for a little while and gives it a minute, he'll have an opportunity to cut later is probably incorrect. But I think that's probably what he'll do is he'll he'll expect that this is just short lived and ⁓ give it a minute and he'll have an opportunity to cut. I don't know. Do you think they actually would raise rates? I just I mean, I know that
You've never seen, I don't think, a period where the Fed Fund's futures or the two-year, let's say, for example, has traded this far above Fed funds and it hasn't been ratified because, you know, the Fed generally follows the market, not the other way around. But this time, you know, and I hate to say this time is different, but I just I'm not ready to make that bet. But what do you think on that?
Craig (18:30)
Yeah.
I've just,
in my experience, you know, they try to make it sound like there's this dual mandate, right? Where we're going to control inflation and fully employment, which means grease them enough cash out there to keep the banks afloat and keep the markets going and all that kind of stuff. And it just seemed like they've always, it's not one and one A, it's like, we're going to grease the markets. And then if we can, somewhere along the lines, help the little guy by controlling inflation, we will.
Stephanie Pomboy (19:06)
get to
Craig (19:07)
Yeah. So,
I mean, don't you kind of think that that's way it's always been? When you think kind of think that that's how it's always going to be.
Stephanie Pomboy (19:13)
I mean, I think what's interesting is that Warsh's whole idea, and I think a lot of this has been, I read it through Art Laffer and what he's been saying, because I think the two of them kind of help cobble together this general idea, was that it would be sort of a Volcker-style monetary approach where they were focused on the money supply.
as a mechanism to control prices. And the way that they would focus on the money supply would be through the balance sheet. So basically, when they felt like commodity prices were running too far too fast, they would just shrink the balance sheet. And then, you know, the Fed funds might be the ability to just say to Trump, hey, look, we're going to cut Fed funds, right? Meanwhile, they're draining out of the banking system from the other side. So it's a little bit of giving with one hand, taking with the other.
⁓ The concern that I have is the one I mentioned earlier, and that is you have a highly unstable treasury market to begin with, and the balance sheet is the thing that affects that. Also, to your point, if you're lowering the Fed funds rate, right now the only constituent that benefits from that is the federal government. The private sector doesn't borrow anything resembling the Fed funds rate. They're all borrowing at what...
Craig (20:15)
Yeah.
Stephanie Pomboy (20:34)
five, 10 year sort of segment of the curve that's not moving at all or moving higher as the case may be. ⁓ So you're basically rewarding the very people that we'd like to see, you know, put in handcuffs so they can stop spending for once ⁓ and, you know, not helping out the little guy.
Craig (20:54)
But they make the argument that by keeping the garment going and keeping the plate spinning, the little guy benefits that way.
Stephanie Pomboy (21:01)
yeah. Yeah. Now, it's like a reverse multiplier to subtractor or divisor as the case may be in terms of government spending. But yeah, it's a tricky situation. I do wonder, like, why did he want the job so badly? ⁓ they're not crazy. You know, if they didn't want
Craig (21:08)
Right. Well.
right? Did they call you? Did they vet you at all?
But yeah.
Stephanie Pomboy (21:30)
If they didn't want Judy Shelton, they sure as hell don't want me because I would just be like, all right, I'm shutting the lights out and calling it a day. The Fed no longer exists at the institution. So you can.
Craig (21:40)
Right.
Jim Grant would have been a good head of the, the, but they're not calling him either. Yeah. So it is what it is.
Stephanie Pomboy (21:45)
Yeah. ⁓ my God. Can you see
the Humphrey Hawkins testimony with Jim Grant fielding questions from Maxine Waters? That would be something else.
Craig (21:54)
my gosh.
I think that would be in the first Hempke administration. I'd have you the secretary of the treasury and we make Jim Grant the head of the Fed and then we'd all be strung up because the economy would collapse and everything else would go on. We'd be doing what we could, but it probably wouldn't go over well. ⁓ Steph, thank you so much. a reminder on the way out, ⁓ macromavens.com. What will people find there?
Stephanie Pomboy (22:03)
you
Yep. Yeah, now.
they'll find all kinds of salacious material relating to things that could possibly go wrong someday. No, ⁓ you know, you'll find out information about some of my major calls over time where I am now, some recent video and how you can subscribe, of course, which would be wonderful.
⁓ And elsewhere, I do occasionally post on Twitter, although ⁓ it comes in fits and starts, so at S-POMBOY there. And other than that, you know, forums like this, I always love to visit with you. ⁓ So just keep an eye out.
Craig (23:04)
Macro
mavens one word, correct? All right. I just, I just can't, I tell people on my side all the time and anytime I look, you've got to find independent voices, ⁓ objective voices to keep you up to speed. Cause it's such a rapidly changing world. ⁓ my friend, Steph Pomboy, one of those independent objective voices, Steph, thank you so much for your time. It's just been great to visit with you as it always is.
Stephanie Pomboy (23:06)
That's it, macromavens.com. You got it.
It's always
fun, so much fun. Great to see you.
Craig (23:33)
And please keep an eye on this channel if you've been watching this. There's still a little time left in May, we got more content to come and obviously it's going to be a busy summer too, so like or subscribe whichever platform you've been watching and like I said keep an on the channel as a very busy month of May continues.
Don’t miss a precious opportunity.
Now that you’ve gained a deeper understanding of the market, explore our selection of gold, silver and platinum bars, coins, and exclusive Sprott products.
About Sprott Money
Specializing in the sale of bullion, bullion storage and precious metals registered investments, there’s a reason Sprott Money is called “The Most Trusted Name in Precious Metals”.
Since 2008, our customers have trusted us to provide guidance, education, and superior customer service as we help build their holdings in precious metals—no matter the size of the portfolio. Chairman, Eric Sprott, and President, Larisa Sprott, are proud to head up one of the most well-known and reputable precious metal firms in North America. Learn more about Sprott Money.
Learn More
You Might Also Like:
Looks like there are no comments yet.